Faith Based Investing

Would you fly in a single-engine plane without a parachute? Would you go white-water rafting without a life preserver? Would you travel the desert without a canteen? If not, would that show a lack of faith in God? You may say that’s absurd, but many people consider insurance a lack of faith.

Many people choose self-insurance or go without insurance while others take on too much insurance. During downtimes, insurance can be a financial lifesaver. But is it wise and godly to protect against illness, death, accident, or theft? Many refuse insurance simply because they argue that it takes God out of the picture. However, God’s Word instructs us to prepare for good and bad times.

When insurance is used properly it can help a family during a major illness or disability, it can provide replacement income for the loss of a spouse, it can rebuild a damaged home, and it can pay medical bills during an extended stay in a nursing home. Insurance will never cover every catastrophe, but it can be a wise way to protect the assets and income God blesses you with. You should also be careful not to allow insurance to be a replacement for God. Balancing wise planning and faith in God should be the goal of  every  protection plan—enough to protect your family, but not so much as to limit your dependence on God.

In his book Money, Possessions, and Eternity, Randy Alcorn asks, “But where does God fit into all this? The greatest danger in insurance is that it so easily undermines our sense of dependency on God. Is  insurance a God-given means of provision, or is it in reality a theological end-run that makes trust obsolete and God unnecessary?” The act of buying insurance in itself doesn’t show a lack of trust in

God; instead it demonstrates proper planning. God clearly wants us to provide for our families as demonstrated in 1Timothy 5:8: “If anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (NASB).

But we cannot be too greedy and slothful with our insurance policies either. Life insurance is a financial tool just like a mutual fund, a stock, or a CD. These tools are morally neutral. The attitude in using the tools determines whether insurance is being used properly in God’s eyes. Insurance should not be bought because of fear but rather with faith.

Jeff’s Legacy

Jeff worked at a telephone company for nearly twenty years after graduating from high school. At thirty-seven, he was the sole breadwinner for his family. He always thought that his company would take care of him in the event of an untimely death. He was confident that his family was secure. He was a family man and loved spending time with his wife, Julie, and their two young children. They were fortunate that Jeff’s income allowed Julie to stay home with the children.

When he came in for an appointment, Jeff was shocked that he was underinsured. If he passed away, his group term insurance would have covered only two times his yearly salary.  This would last only four to six years with his family’s current expenses. His wife would have to go back to work and put the kids in day care. Jeff opted to buy additional life insurance to cover his income until the kids were through college. Sadly, this was the wisest investment that Jeff ever made.

Less than a year after being accepted for insurance, he was diagnosed with brain cancer. Jeff never reached his thirty-ninth birthday. The silver lining in the story was the policy that Jeff bought for his family. He prepared and planned and left his family in a sound financial position. Julie says, “Had Jeff not met with you, a tragedy would have been made worse. Yes, God could have performed a miracle. He could have used the church family to bail us out, but through this policy, He was able to carry us through the toughest loss we ever faced.” Julie has since gone to nursing school at night and become an RN. The insurance proceeds allowed her to pursue a passion rather than forcing her to take a job.

Why Insure?

Insurance provides protection for unanticipated expenses you couldn’t otherwise pay. For example, in the case of Jeff and Julie, insurance was used to produce needed income after Jeff’s death. Buying insurance is like looking ahead. If you knew you would face a financial problem down the road and could afford to protect your family and your assets at a fraction of the replacement cost, why would you not at least consider it? Insurance also frees up surplus funds.

In Jeff and Julie’s case, Jeff made $85,000 a year.  When he died, the family still needed at least $75,000 in yearly income. Social Security provided around $12,000 a year for dependent care. The family still needed $63,000 a year to cover the gap. Where would these funds come from? Jeff and his family could have saved over time, but in this case he had less than a year to live. The other alternative was to buy insurance, which he did, and that turned out to be the wise choice. No one knows what the future holds, but planning ahead is prudent and resourceful.

September is National Life Insurance Awareness Month

When was the last time you looked at your life insurance coverage?

Why not do it now? September is as good a time as any – in fact, this is National Life Insurance Awareness Month. The non-profit Life and Health Insurance Foundation for Education (LIFE) wants to awaken Americans to the need for life insurance, and its remarkable utility as an estate planning and tax-saving tool. Click here to read more »

CLEARING UP THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE

Who would fund the reforms? Would there really be a “death list”?

Sorting out the possibilities, facts and misconceptions.

The town hall debates over health care reform have ignited Americans like few recent issues. Discourses have become shouting matches. Away from the noise, here is a roundup of where things currently stand.

Who would pay for all this? Over the next 10 years, the federal government will need (by President Obama’s estimation) $950 billion to fund its health care programs. As planned, roughly a third of the money will be raised through increased revenues (i.e., limiting tax deductions for the wealthiest Americans) and two-thirds of it is supposed to come from reallocations of taxpayer money the federal government is already scheduled to receive. A coalition of pharmaceutical industry CEOs met with the President in July and have since pledged $80 billion in cost savings over the coming decade to help pay for the reform.

Would Medicare be cut? Republicans and Democrats disagree. “Nobody is talking about trying to change Medicare benefits,” President Obama stated during a July AARP teleconference. “What we want to do is to eliminate some of the waste that is being paid for out of the Medicare trust fund.” The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office figures that the House of Representatives version of the bill would trim Medicare spending by $500 billion across the next decade with no impact on Medicare benefits. AARP claims that “none of the health care reform proposals being considered by Congress would cut Medicare benefits or increase your out-of-pocket costs for Medicare services.” However, in an August 15 Republican Party radio address, Sen. Orrin Hatch contended that “hundreds of billions of dollars” will be cut from Medicare and used to “expand a financially-strapped Medicaid program and create another government-run plan.”

Would this run up the deficit further? The Congressional Budget Office says yes. It forecasts that President Obama’s reforms would add $239 billion to the federal deficit. Few on Capitol Hill think the reform effort could pay for itself.

Would health care be rationed? That’s what ex-Alaska Governor Sarah Palin contended in a Facebook post. The potential Republican presidential candidate stated that the reforms would lead to a system that would “refuse to allocate medical resources to the elderly, the infirm, and the disabled who have less economic potential.” Democrats and other supporters of the reforms counter her claim by saying that the current health care system already features “rationed” care dictated by health insurance company bureaucrats.

Would there really be “death panels”? Earlier this month, Palin contended that the President’s health care reform proposals included “death panels” that would decide if seriously ill patients would live or die. In the eyes of many legislators, Palin was wildly misinterpreting a provision in the health care reform bill that would allow doctors to offer voluntary consultations about living wills, hospice care, health care directives and pain medication to patients and loved ones facing end-of-life decisions. (If the reforms pass, Medicare would pay physicians to provide this consulting.) The Senate Finance Committee has dropped this idea from its version of the proposed legislation; it remains in the House version.

Would the government (and taxpayer dollars) pay for abortions? It is uncertain. In one variant of the health care reform bill, abortions would have to be available via at least one insurance plan; however, Democrats say any abortions would be paid through patient premiums.

Would undocumented immigrants get free health care? On the CBS Evening News, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) was heard stating, “Illegal aliens will not be in this bill, period, the end.” As currently written, the legislation states that only those lawfully present in the United States can qualify for health coverage. Yet what if one family member is in America legally, but others aren’t? Could his or her relatives become eligible? Republicans say that the proposed legislation offers no way to effectively stop undocumented immigrants from applying for health care benefits.

The debate rages on. Politically, the health care reform effort seems poised to end up being the story of the year – and the contention and negotiation will certainly last into fall. Stay tuned.

THE INS AND OUTS OF LIFE INSURANCE

If you’re just starting to look into life insurance,
the myriad of choices can be confusing.

Man is Mortal. That makes life insurance a little unique and interesting, doesn’t it? We purchase things like health insurance, car insurance and home insurance, then hope we never have a need to use them. Life insurance is different, because it’s a widely accepted fact that sooner or later, each one of us will die.

So many choices. When it comes to life insurance, there are many options. You may have heard terms like “whole life insurance”, “term insurance” or “variable insurance” … but what does it all mean? And what are the differences? Well, first let me point out what they have in common: all life insurance policies provide payment to a beneficiary in the event of your death. Except for that basic tenet, the differences between policies can be major.

Whole life insurance. This type of insurance covers your entire life (not just a portion or a “term” of it). Insurance companies tend to be cautious when selecting their investments, so the benefits could be lower than if you invested on your own. Whole life policies also tend to cost more than “term” policies. This is both because they grow what is known as “cash value”, and because after a time you will be able to borrow against or withdraw from your whole life benefits.

Term insurance. Rather than covering your whole life, “term” insurance covers a pre-determined portion of your life. If you die within that term, your beneficiaries receive a death benefit. If not, generally you get nothing. To put it simply, term insurance allows you to purchase more coverage for less money. Basically, you are betting on the probability of your death occurring within that specified “term”.

Variable life insurance. Variable life insurance is a permanent insurance. However, unlike whole life insurance, variable insurance allows you to invest the cash value of your policy in “subaccounts” (which can include money market funds, bonds or stocks). Variable insurance offers a bit of control, as the value and benefit depend upon the performance of the subaccounts you select. However, that means there could be significant risk involved, since the performance of your subaccounts cannot be guaranteed.

Universal life insurance. With universal insurance, it all comes down to flexibility. It is permanent life insurance that provides access to cash values that build up tax-deferred. You can choose the amount of coverage you feel is appropriate, and you retain the ability to increase or decrease that amount as needs change (subject to minimums and requirements). You also have some flexibility in determining how much of your premium is goes towards insurance, and how much is used within the policy’s investment element.

So, which is right for you? Many factors come into play when deciding what type of life insurance will best suit your needs. The best thing to do is speak with a trusted and qualified financial professional who can assist you in looking at all the factors and help you to choose the policy that will work best for you.